A museum protects things that cannot be replaced, in buildings that are open to the public by day and empty by night. The security configuration that earns its keep is about the hours nobody is there, and the rooms the public never enters.
The exposure is concentrated in the closed hours, which makes schedules the primary configuration tool.
Stores, workshops and loading areas hold more than the galleries at any given moment, and have far less footfall.
Mounting positions, cabling routes and lighting are often fixed by the building itself rather than chosen.
Which of these apply to you, and which cameras can carry them, is what the site survey establishes before anything is proposed.
A person detected in a marked area during the closed window.
The detection frame with the area drawn on the camera view.
Security round, contractor, or unexplained.
Alert to the control room with the frame, and the clip retained.
A badge opens a store or workshop, or a person is detected inside it out of hours.
The camera at that door, at the moment of the event.
Whether the person matches the credential on record.
Logged with evidence for the collection-management record.
Movement at the loading bay when no movement is booked.
A timestamped frame at the bay.
A judgement made from the picture rather than a door contact.
Escalated to the duty manager, evidence retained.
Someone crosses the boundary or enters a courtyard after hours.
The boundary camera, lit where a floodlight is wired in.
Person or animal, settled from the frame.
Voice challenge where a speaker covers it, alert to the on-call responder.
Areas carry the hours they are off limits, so the public day raises nothing and the closed hours raise what matters.
Standard RTSP and ONVIF on the estate you have. Where a position is poor, the survey says so rather than promising around it.
The appliance runs on your own network; continuous video does not leave the building.
Light and voice challenge in back-of-house and outdoor areas; silent alerting where an announcement would be the wrong move.
PARVEK detects people and vehicles and where they are. It does not do object-removal or item-taken analytics, and we would not claim it does — protecting individual objects remains a matter for your case, mount and physical security measures.
Capabilities are selected per site during the survey. Nothing is on by default, and several depend on camera placement and lighting — which is what the survey establishes.
Identify people, vehicles, objects and security events as they happen.
Add identity, context, movement and event intelligence to live video.
Trigger alerts, sirens, speakers, lights, guard workflows and evidence when action matters.
Camera streams, recording, playback, AI events, evidence clips, alerts, reports, users and roles and camera health — centralised in one appliance inside your premises. Faces, clips and reports stay on site.
Camera count, retention and storage are specified per appliance configuration and confirmed during the assessment.
We do not publish improvement percentages, because none have been measured across a fleet and yours would not match them anyway. What a bounded proof of concept gives you is your own numbers, on your own footage:
No. Item-removal analytics is not something PARVEK does, and we will not claim it. What it does well is tell you a person was in a place they should not have been, at a time nobody should have been, with the footage to prove it.
It matters a great deal, and it is better established up front. The survey records what each existing position can actually resolve, and says plainly where a capability will not work from where the camera has to live.
Only where you want it to. Most configurations are scheduled to the closed hours for gallery space, with back-of-house areas carrying their own windows.
No. It watches the same spaces on camera and raises its own events with a picture attached. Where you already run an intruder system, the survey works out which camera covers each zone so the two work together.
See how PARVEK supports this workflow.
See how PARVEK supports this workflow.
See how PARVEK supports this workflow.
Access and perimeter events across halls, cages and the site boundary, each with the footage that explains it.
Perimeter, restricted zones, yard movement and shift-change activity on a working plant.
Unmanned compounds and remote sites, analysed at the edge where the link is thin or intermittent.
AI surveillance and analytics are technology-assisted and do not guarantee prevention or detection of every security incident or 100% accuracy.