A school or campus is busy during the day and empty for most of the week. The security problem is concentrated in the hours nobody is there, and at the boundary — which is also where a small team has the least ability to watch.
Evenings, weekends and holidays are the exposure. Schedules matter more here than almost anywhere else.
Sites are open in shape and often lightly staffed outside hours, with one caretaker covering a lot of ground.
Cameras added in phases over many years, with uneven coverage and uneven night performance.
Which of these apply to you, and which cameras can carry them, is what the site survey establishes before anything is proposed.
A person detected in a marked outdoor area during hours the site is closed.
The detection frame with the area drawn on the camera view.
A person or an animal, settled from the picture rather than a sensor state.
Light on where one is wired, voice challenge where a speaker covers it, alert to the caretaker.
A person inside a restricted area outside its permitted window.
The frame at the moment of detection.
Contractor working late, or an unexplained entry.
Alert with the clip, retained for the incident log.
Movement at the fence line or a gate when the site is closed.
The boundary camera, lit if a floodlight is wired in.
Whether it warrants a call-out.
Escalation to the nominated phones with the frame attached.
A camera goes offline, is moved or is obscured.
The last usable frame and the time it stopped.
Raised as an event in its own right.
Repaired before an incident proves it was blind.
Areas carry the schedule they are off limits. During the day, those areas simply do not raise events.
Standard RTSP and ONVIF, read directly or through the existing recorder.
The appliance runs on your own network. Continuous video does not leave the site.
An unlit field at the end of a wide lens cannot be fixed in software. The survey says which areas need light before anything is promised.
The configuration here is deliberately about places and hours rather than individuals. What is retained, for how long and who can see it are decisions you make and we configure, and they belong in your own policy review before anything runs.
Capabilities are selected per site during the survey. Nothing is on by default, and several depend on camera placement and lighting — which is what the survey establishes.
Identify people, vehicles, objects and security events as they happen.
Add identity, context, movement and event intelligence to live video.
Trigger alerts, sirens, speakers, lights, guard workflows and evidence when action matters.
Camera streams, recording, playback, AI events, evidence clips, alerts, reports, users and roles and camera health — centralised in one appliance inside your premises. Faces, clips and reports stay on site.
Camera count, retention and storage are specified per appliance configuration and confirmed during the assessment.
We do not publish improvement percentages, because none have been measured across a fleet and yours would not match them anyway. What a bounded proof of concept gives you is your own numbers, on your own footage:
No. The useful configuration for a campus is areas and hours — a boundary at night, a plant room out of hours. During the school day those areas raise nothing. We would steer you away from anything that amounts to monitoring people going about their day.
Usually not. What matters is placement, lighting and resolution at the distance involved rather than age. The free camera check and site assessment tell you which of yours are usable before anyone proposes a purchase.
Threat detection is offered only on qualified deployments after site-specific validation, and it is not something we enable because a tier was purchased. For most campuses the questions that actually get answered are boundary and out-of-hours presence.
Whoever you nominate — caretaker, on-call manager, or several people at once. Delivery is push notification with the frame attached, plus the console for anyone at a desk.
See how PARVEK supports this workflow.
See how PARVEK supports this workflow.
See how PARVEK supports this workflow.
Access and perimeter events across halls, cages and the site boundary, each with the footage that explains it.
Perimeter, restricted zones, yard movement and shift-change activity on a working plant.
Unmanned compounds and remote sites, analysed at the edge where the link is thin or intermittent.
AI surveillance and analytics are technology-assisted and do not guarantee prevention or detection of every security incident or 100% accuracy.