A working plant has cameras everywhere and nobody with time to watch them. The places where an unnoticed event becomes an expensive one — plant rooms, material stores, conveyor runs, yard corners — are exactly the places with no footfall.
An estate built up over a decade usually covers the site well. The footage gets used after incidents rather than during them.
What counts as normal changes completely at shift end, which is what makes schedules more useful here than thresholds.
Dust, steam, vibration and glare all cut what a lens can resolve. That is a per-camera fact, not a per-site one.
Which of these apply to you, and which cameras can carry them, is what the site survey establishes before anything is proposed.
Someone enters a marked area during the window it should be empty.
The detection frame with the area drawn on the camera view.
Contractor working late, or someone who should not be there.
Spoken announcement in that room where a speaker exists, silent alert where announcing it would be wrong.
A person enters the yard across a boundary rather than through the gate.
The boundary camera, lit by the floodlight if one is wired to the appliance.
The frame answers person-or-animal immediately.
Light on, voice challenge, alert to the on-call phone, clip retained.
A vehicle at a gate or in the yard when the site is closed.
A timestamped frame of the vehicle at the line it crossed.
Expected delivery, or not.
Logged with the frame; escalated where it is not on the schedule.
A person detected on the floor where someone normally works unaccompanied.
The frame and the clip around it.
Raised immediately rather than discovered on the next round.
Alert to the supervisor and the nominated phones, with the location.
More people in an area than the count agreed for it.
The live count shown on the frame.
An operational record rather than a security alarm.
Counts to the daily report; alert only where you set one.
Mixed estates are the normal case. Reading standard streams rather than vendor SDKs is what makes them workable.
Each area carries its own schedule, which is what keeps event volume reviewable on a site that is busy twelve hours a day.
Speakers, floodlights and sirens driven from relay outputs on the appliance. What they are wired to is a site decision.
PARVEK adds visual context around an area. It is not a certified safety or life-safety device and does not replace one.
Dust, steam, vibration and glare all affect what a camera can resolve, and it varies by location. This is exactly what a proof of concept on your own cameras settles — it shows the real behaviour in your conditions rather than a number from someone else’s site.
Capabilities are selected per site during the survey. Nothing is on by default, and several depend on camera placement and lighting — which is what the survey establishes.
Identify people, vehicles, objects and security events as they happen.
Add identity, context, movement and event intelligence to live video.
Trigger alerts, sirens, speakers, lights, guard workflows and evidence when action matters.
Camera streams, recording, playback, AI events, evidence clips, alerts, reports, users and roles and camera health — centralised in one appliance inside your premises. Faces, clips and reports stay on site.
Camera count, retention and storage are specified per appliance configuration and confirmed during the assessment.
We do not publish improvement percentages, because none have been measured across a fleet and yours would not match them anyway. What a bounded proof of concept gives you is your own numbers, on your own footage:
Not as a shipped connector, and we will not claim otherwise. PARVEK raises its own events from the cameras on site, which is what most plants actually need. Bringing in alerts from a control system is worked out with you during the survey, against the specific system you run.
No. Certified life-safety and process-safety devices remain authoritative. PARVEK can add visual context around an area but is not a substitute for certified detection.
Usually not. Age matters less than placement, lighting and how many pixels land on a person at the distance that matters. The assessment tells you which of your cameras are usable as they are.
Each site runs its own appliance with processing local to it, and events roll up with role-based access per site.
See how PARVEK supports this workflow.
See how PARVEK supports this workflow.
See how PARVEK supports this workflow.
Access and perimeter events across halls, cages and the site boundary, each with the footage that explains it.
Unmanned compounds and remote sites, analysed at the edge where the link is thin or intermittent.
Entrances, reception, restricted rooms and after-hours activity across multiple buildings.
AI surveillance and analytics are technology-assisted and do not guarantee prevention or detection of every security incident or 100% accuracy.